Google
 

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Psychological Challenges of Speculative Trading 2

After such a loss, traders blame themselves, repeatedly going through the details of the unsuccessful trade. They blame the market for the “wrong behavior” or themselves for errors in what then seems an absolutely clear situation. Sometimes, the trader-market relationship takes
the form of a vendetta. Traders consider the market as their personal enemy, treat it in an unfriendly way (even with hate) and dream of immediate revenge. Doing so, they miss the fact that they are essentially blaming nature for changing sunny weather to rain. It is very important to be prepared beforehand for this change. Trades should always have close at hand one or a few options in case of sudden change of the situation/weather, so that their foresight assures their good time or good profit.
The third main psychological problem is trader uncertainty, especially when traders are inexperienced in abilities and skills—specifically about each market position they hold. Immediately after each position is opened and a money contract is bought, traders start questioning their choices. This is revealed most vividly in the case of a moderately active market at the moment of fluctuations close to the opening price of the position. Any movement (even insignificant) against their position causes traders to have an irresistible desire to sell the recently acquired contract to limit losses, until it is too late and the market does not shift too far away from their position opening price. On the other hand, an insignificant market shift in the desirable direction causes the same desire to eliminate the position, until it provides for any (even tiny) profit and before this profit does not turn into losses.
Scared and troubled traders rush and race about. They open and liquidate their positions too often, and experience many small losses and gains. Within a short period of time, they turn intermittently into bulls or bears. As a result, they suffer losses on a dealer’s spread and/or commissions when there were no significant market changes, and all the market fluctuations were no more than just regular market “noise.” Such losses are typical for beginners and individual traders with small investment capital or little experience and insufficient psychological preparation.
Not uncommon are cases of traders’ impulsive decisions on trading, without any plans or serious preliminary market analysis. The position is opened under an impulsive, invalid emotional reaction. Often, it can be explained by traders’ fears of losing a brilliant opportunity to earn money they think is being offered by the market at that moment. I have witnessed these attempts to jump onto the last carriage of a departing train, and such attempts have ruined a lot of traders. Many traders cannot calmly watch any kind of market movements. Some of my students have confirmed this reality. If they have no positions at the moment of more or less
significant market movement, they consider it as a lost opportunity to gain profit. This can inflict a serious shock to them. When they have no position, they seem unable to realize that each market movement can be considered both ways, and the opposite situation can quite possibly develop. Statistics show that, at each market movement, the chances to lose are much higher than to profit. How does it happen that reasonable people (who in everyday life, without any emotion, can watch a bank cashier counting other people’s money) consider the fact of market movement as a threat to their own pockets? Why is other people’s money in the hands of a bank cashier not considered as a lost profit, whereas capital shift on the market and the corresponding quote fluctuations are the causes of negative emotions? I think the answer is in the illusory simplicity of business itself, which is considered by many people as a good and simple opportunity to earn a lot of easy money. Similar notions are widely spread among novice currency traders. The soon traders abandon such ideas, the sooner they become professionally efficient traders.
The most difficult problem for every trader (regardless of their experiences) is to learn as quickly as possible how to recover quickly from losses, which are inevitable in this business. At the same time, they must learn to handle shocks and psychological damage inflicted by the losses, because these situations could negatively influence their future work. The losses themselves and the fear of losing, both of which permanently torture traders, negatively influence their ability to make reasonable decisions in a complicated situation. These factors also undermine traders’ ability to follow their own rules about trade strategies and systems. I have become personally acquainted with hundreds of traders and have watched their activities. I have taught many students, and have had my own experience as a trader at various steps of my career in the currency market. Therefore, I have come to the conclusion that the main causes of trader failures in speculative operations in the FOREX market are without a doubt those associated with psychological trauma—the inability to control their own emotions and to find an adequate way to fight stress.
I have explored ways of solving the psychological problems that arise from operations in the FOREX market, with the focus on increasing selfresistance to stressful situations and increasing trade effectiveness. As a result of my research, I have managed to develop a trading method that also helps to withstand shocks and keep emotions under control. To solve the problem of stress, I had to separate the problem into several parts and solve them one by one. First, it was necessary to develop the philosophical conception of my attitude toward market situations. By this I mean not only the general trade methods, which are discussed in the second part of the course, but also my own conception of the market and associated psychological problems, which most traders (including myself) have to overcome daily.

Read More..

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Psychological Challenges of Speculative Trading 1

Asuccessful trader’s career mainly depends on his or her psychological stability in stressful situations, which are common in the process of trading. Theoretical knowledge can be acquired by reading professional literature; practical skills and experience are acquired in the process of actual trading. The most difficult process is adjusting psychological stress, because in real life it is impossible to completely eliminate the stress factor influencing human activity. Underestimating the stress factor could play a mean trick on traders and even completely block their abilities to make reasonable decisions in real trading situations. The psychological stress of those trading in the FOREX (and any other) market is extremely high. Traders must work under permanent psychological pressure, making decisions in highly unpredictable and uncertain market situations. Each trader goes through mistakes, failures, and losses in his or her own way, in accordance with his or her personality and temper. Some might blame their failures on the market’s “wrong behavior,” which didn’t comply with the trader’s brilliant forecast and caused the failure of the magnificently planned speculative combination. Others blame themselves and their own inabilities to make right decisions in situations, which afterwards seem to be simple. It is an interesting fact that, in hindsight, traders usually find the decision that should have been made at the lost critical moment and can reasonably prove their point of view. Why can they find
the right decision so easily and quickly in hindsight? Was the trader unable to do so at the right moment? I don’t think it can be simply explained by looking at yesterday’s situation from today’s point of view. I do notthink it can be explained by the fact that classical technical analysis allows for multiple explanations of almost any market situation. It is always possible to find an appropriate basic explanation for any market shift after the event takes place. In the heat of the moment, however, the trader was influenced by stress, and that stress caused the error. This is proven by the fact that most novice traders show exceptionally good (and even phenomenal) results trading dummy accounts but can’t even come near those results when trading with real money.
Being permanently under stress, a trader can often make insufficiently considered, impulsive, and, therefore, wrong decisions that result in losses or premature liquidation of profitable positions, that is, in lost profit. Sometimes, after a few successive failures with various trades, traders becomes fearful of the market. They are in a state of psychological stupor, and even a simple market situation may cause panic. They cannot overcome their emotions or soberly evaluate the current situation, and they are unable to make any decision—reasonable or otherwise. In many cases when the market situation shifts against the trader’s position, they can only passively watch the growth of their losses, because they are unable to make any decision at all. Often, after the market stabilizes and traders have the opportunity to calmly analyze daily diagrams of currency fluctuations, they come to the conclusion that the main cause of failure was not the lack of knowledge or training but their own emotions. However, the situation cannot be reversed. Time has passed, money has been lost, and everything should be begun again.
Another problem that causes severe and even catastrophic consequences is the trader’s wishful thinking. In this case, traders are sure that their forecast of market trends is solely correct. They feel the market cannot and should not give any surprises. They do not consider other options that could be helpful or they think of other options in a vague and uncertain form. Sometimes, traders consider a market shift against their position as short-term and temporary. They begin to average their positions.
They acquire new contracts at a lower price in the hope that the market situation will come back, and all the positions will become highly profitable. Afterwards, as the situation worsens, they will be able to come out of the market without serious losses. Being sure they are right, traders lose the ability to critically evaluate the condition of the market and accordingly their own position in the market. In this case, they consider only those basic and technical features that justify their wishful thinking, and they discard the contradicting features. This wishful thinking costs them dearly and can lead to psychological frustration. The market’s “wrong behavior” not only deprives traders of a certain amount of money and often ruins their trading account, but also undermines their self-esteem and their hopes of being a winner in the trading battle.

Read More..

Monday, July 21, 2008

Developing a Trading Method

The most difficult process is adjusting the human psychological factor, because in real life it is impossible to completely get rid of the psychological factor influencing human activity. I think it is very important for the reader of this book to follow me in creating the method, beginning with the definition and identification of the problems that need to be solved. Then, after initial ideas are formed, we will continue to the development of effective trade principles and the creation
of an integrated conception of systematic trading methods. I would like each trader to understand the essence and logic of my method, which allows a transition from vague emotions and desires to specific targets, in order to develop an effective trading technique. I think this approach to training is the best. It allows the trader to not only follow my line of thought but also, using the information acquired in this book, to extend each trader’s individual (not only professional) experience, with the aim of critically evaluating the acquired information. For this reason, I decided to violate the traditionally taught sequence of many books, manuals, and training aids, and state my book in the sequence of the development of my method. The psychological problems shared by many traders will be addressed, and the conclusion will be proven that it is necessary to switch to a systematic trading method without forming a rigid mechanical trading system. This desire, and the necessity to get rid of the excessive and permanent psychological stress that negatively influences the results of my everyday trading inspired me to develop the new systematic trading method. The initial requirements for the optimal trade methods and the consequent trade systems are formulated. Next, some basic elements for the trade method development are described - using trading tools corresponding to the basic principles of effective trading. Along with my own ideas and elaboration, they will be used as the basic components of effective trading. Each trader goes through mistakes, failures, and losses in his or her own way and in accordance with his or her personality and temper.

Read More..

Sunday, July 20, 2008

choose dealer : RECENT INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS

Some significant changes, both positive and negative, took place in the FOREX trading world over the past few years. First let me mention three positive changes:
1. By the year 2006 the industry of FOREX trading had become more government regulated in the United States. Nowadays, the NFA regulates most of the dealers and introducing brokers conducting business in the United States, including foreign dealing companies providing services to U.S. customers. So, now the probability for a trader or an investor to become a fraud victim has greatly decreased.
2. Stronger competition among numerous dealing companies has made them offer their customers better services that include more sophisticated trading software, lower spreads, and faster and more accurate trade execution.
3. Reputable dealers now offer their customers the opportunity to trade contracts as small as $10,000. This is good for beginners, who today can make real trades without risking too much money while learning the business.
However, along with positive changes there also were two negative ones:
First, the same competition among dealers that improved quality of their services overall led to the situation that now almost every dealer could be considered a bucket shop. Today the dealers routinely trade against their customers, especially those individuals with smaller trading
capital. In order to increase their revenues, some of the larger dealers on a daily basis carry an uncovered exposure totaling well over $100 million of the positions taken by their customers. At first glance it seems that there shouldn’t be a problem. The rule of the game is that the house must always win and there are reasons to believe that most of the clients’ trading capital sooner or later ends up in the dealer’s pocket anyway, pretty much like in the gambling industry. (Dealers’ back office statistics show that approximately 60 percent of their clients’ total trading capital is being lost in trading annually.) However, unlike in the casino business where the house
is always able to control each and every aspect of the game, there could be some very dramatic and fast changes in the market that wouldn’t allow the dealer to cover its exposure before it becomes too late. Unexpected, almost instantaneous, and sizeable shifts in currency exchange quotes could be damaging to the point where a dealer would not be able to fulfill its financial obligations toward its customers. The other change that I consider to be rather negative is the trend of most dealers lowering their margin requirements. Today it is quite possible to find a dealer offering to its customers a margin as low as 0.5 percent. Dealers present low-margin trading as an opportunity for customers to achieve greater profitability with smaller investment capital. It is true, but trading on full leverage also could easily cause the loss of the entire trading capital in a single trade in a matter of minutes. It looks like trading in the financial market is turning into a casino-style business, which is not good in my view.

Read More..

Saturday, July 19, 2008

IS IT NECESSARY TO PAY COMMISSIONS AND OTHER PAYMENTS AND DUES?

The most reputable dealer companies charge no commissions for transactions executed by their clients. Others charge some commissions, but usually not very high ones. Personally, I cannot excuse some dealers charging so-called storage fees. In the financial world, the client is usually
paid when he stores his money—not the dealer. Reputable dealers transferring an open position to the following day execute the rollover operation in accordance with the current LIBOR rates and reflect it in a daily statement.
Depending on the currency pair and direction in which the position was opened at the moment of its transfer to the next day, the client could actually win as a result of the transfer. A certain amount would be added to his account just for holding the position open for more than one day.
Other dealer companies do not bother themselves with such calculations but simply charge the client for the interest on the position transferred to the following day. There are numerous discussions about the possibility of holding two opposite positions open when both long and short positions exist simultaneously. At a dealer’s statement in such case, both positions are shown to exist in reality. Each one generates profit and/or loss, and in such form they could be transferred to the following day. I have met a few traders whose manner of trading envisaged such a condition or who used it as an important part of their trading strategy.
I think such arguments are useless and senseless. The positions cannot voluntarily be divided into new and liquidation—depending on a trader’s will. The market functions in accordance with certain rules, and it is arranged in such a manner that positions of the opposite tendencies for the same currency pair and of the same size are offset automatically. The spot part of the FOREX market provides the offset and self-liquidation of all open positions by the end of each trading day. At the beginning of the next day, only those positions are recovered that had not been offset due to the lack of opposite (with opposite sign) transactions of corresponding size. For example, if the trader during the day executed USD/CHF transactions for the total amount of $600,000 to buy and $400,000 to sell, then the long USD/CHF position for the remaining $200,000 would be transferred to the next day. As you can see, this is accompanied by the offset of the opposite positions, and the corresponding gain/loss was deposited into or deducted from the trader’s account. There is a simple reason that some dealers allow and even encourage their clients to keep opposite positions for longer than one day. A dealer company can charge interest for practically nonexisting positions. A dealer company can also create the illusion for the trader that the trader is present at the market and should find a way out of the situation and liquidate
both opposite positions, whereas, in reality, they are nonexistent.
Many traders consider the possibility of keeping these opposite positions an advantage. This advantage allows them to hedge (or lock) their losing trades and to limit their losses in case the market moves against their initial position. At the same time, this possibility creates the illusion that loss of money is not final and that the money could be returned if the “right” way out of the situation was found. If you cannot stand the psychological stress of trading without such useless “placebo” methods, then it is better to reconsider further participation in this business.

Read More..

Friday, July 18, 2008

WHAT ARE THE RISKS OF DOING BUSINESS WITH “BUCKET SHOPS”?

Legal issues (i.e., a set of acts governing and controlling the functions of
banks, dealers, and broker companies in the FOREX market, established
by government agencies) are of primary importance because traders have
to entrust their money to the dealers. First, it is better for traders to make
sure that their money is safe and that the breach of trust is impossible for
the dealer.
I am not a lawyer, so I have no right to advise my clients on legal matters.
The vast majority of dealer companies function in many countries,
with various rules and regulations of which I am not aware. My recommendations
are, therefore, based on my personal experience and preferences.
In any case, you had better survey the problem yourself and
preferably ask a lawyer for legal advice. The following sections outline my
personal opinion concerning dealer choice, considering the security of
capital invested in FOREX operations.

Read More..

Thursday, July 17, 2008

WHAT IS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR ON-LINE TRADING USING THE INTERNET AND ADDITIONAL SERVICES.

Many dealers now offer the opportunity for on-line trading, and more will do so in the future. Internet trading has certain advantages over the traditional telephone communication with a broker or a dealer. The main advantages of on-line trading are:
• The opportunity to monitor market movements by following current real-time prices, graphics, and even news on a PC monitor. Usually, it is free and is included in the service and trading software offered by a dealer.
• Dealer trading software as well as other options often provide the trader with the opportunity to manipulate, modify, and customize graphics; conduct technical analysis using indicators; and draw trend lines, support, and resistance lines. In addition to being convenient, this provides substantial money savings. It eliminates the necessity of buying an expensive market-quotes service, and analytical and charting software for conducting technical analysis.
• Internet trading is supported by safe electronic registration data, which provides the necessary security and lowers the possibility of conflict situations between a trader and a dealer. These conflicts are due to probable human errors and slips of the tongue, which are common during live phone communications.

Read More..

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

choosing Dealer :WHAT ARE THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE OPERATION ACCOUNT SIZE (MINIMUM DEPOSIT)?

Evidently, the more the investment capital, the easier, safer, more flexible and more effective should be its management. The investment and financial means of traders differ. It is a common situation when somebody willing to participate in speculative trading in a currency market simply does not have enough funds to open an account corresponding to the required safety rules. Each trader has his or her own security level, but I think (although it is a debatable issue) that the operable account size for the individual speculative trader begins with a minimal amount of $30,000, assuming that the initial margin is 2 percent and the minimal contract size is $100,000. I think $30,000 is the required minimum amount corresponding to FOREX market conditions, considering the following:
• If trading a single minimal contract of $100,000, a trader loses a pip amount equal to an average daily swing corresponding to $600 to $1,000 (depending on the selected currency pair), then the loss of 2 to 3 percent of the account per single transaction is rather painless. This loss cannot ruin the account, even in the case of a few consecutive losses.
• Traders must consider that the market “noise” amplitude approximates the amplitude of the average daily exchange rate fluctuation. Therefore, setting shorter stops while trading on a medium or longer term is unreasonable, because these stops can be offset by incidental
oscillation ticks.
• Some trading strategies recommended in this course suggest position reversal and doubling the contract size at the same time, which demands some additional margin for the safety of the corresponding working capital.
• Traders should take into consideration that the trader’s job should be adequately reimbursed, including psychological stress, time, and effort spent. There is no reason to spend up to 14 to 16 hours per day trading if you can earn the same money in a less stressful job. Simple calculation shows that even doubling of trading capital in one year can provide you with a secure income, but only in the case of an adequate initial investment.

Read More..

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Choosing the Right Dealer

After a positive decision is made to participate in speculative trading
in the FOREX market, a newcomer should first choose the dealer
for conducting a trade. The right choice greatly influences the final
success of the whole enterprise. Nowadays, the market is overcrowded
with companies and banks offering their services to individual traders and
investors to access the currency market. It is not easy to make the right
choice without a certain set of criteria. These criteria best correspond to
the interests, preferences, and means of each individual trader, and to the
trade strategy and tactics chosen by him.
The best way to find the right dealer is to compose a list of questions
to ask the dealer, before making a final decision in favor of the preferred
company or bank. The following are suggested questions that should be
answered by the dealer before you make the decision to open a trading account.

Read More..

YOU MUST DETERMINE THE LIMITS OF YOUR RISK IN ADVANCE

Overtrade most often reveals itself when the trader (hoping to receive the maximum possible profit) acquires an oversized contract, risking the larger part of his trading capital in just a single transaction. In case a market starts moving against the trader’s position, possible losses can exceed the acceptable limit. The result can be irreparable damage to the working capital, bringing the trading account to a condition unusable for further trade. The account will be unusable in a timely manner in the future, due to the impossibility of covering those losses that occurred during just one transaction. Under current conditions, many banks and dealers offer their clients margin trading terms at a leverage ranging from 20:1 to 50:1 (and even higher). The initial margin as an industry’s average is only 2 to 5 percent.
Considering the average market activity during one day, it is easy to lose half or even a larger part of the trading capital. In order to avoid this occurrence, it is desirable to use certain margin self-limitation and not to use more than 5 to 10 percent of the trading capital during one trade.
Traders should establish their individual limitation for the margin, and possibly keep this limitation not below 10 to 20 percent as compared to the size of the trade contract. In other words, for each $10,000 to $20,000 of the size of your trading capital, only one contract of $100,000 should be traded at any time.
Recommendation
From the very beginning, it is useful to remember that there is no capital so large that it is impossible to lose during speculative operations in the FOREX market. The risk of losing part of or the entire investment capital is always present where there is the possibility to earn. The currency market is not an exception to this rule. In order to earn, the trader must take the risk of loss. In risking, though, traders must determine in advance the limits of their risk. They should never risk all or the largest part of their trading capital at once. They should risk only that part whose loss they are sure will not result in catastrophic consequences for their trading accounts and the resulting inability to further participation in trading.

Read More..

Thursday, January 24, 2008

A New Way of Thinking about Stock Selection

Aparadigm is a framework or model. As we learn and experience, we begin to establish various paradigms relating to all aspects of our lives. Eventually, we establish a framework with which we’re comfortable. We begin to expect that certain ways of thinking or behaving will bring certain results, and we reach a certain comfort level between our actions and the reactions they will create. Sometimes the paradigms we establish serve us well for our entire lives. Other times,
we become dissatisfied with the results our actions create and it becomes necessary to create a new paradigm. When it comes to selecting individual stocks, 99.9 percent of investors and Wall Street analysts are operating using a dog-eared, shop-worn paradigm that is coming apart at the seams. They are all looking for the same thing: growth stocks with earnings momentum that will deliver strong earnings gains indefinitely into the future and enable these companies to justify their sky-high stock prices.
There are two problems with this paradigm: First, it’s been in existence for nearly 20 years and it’s getting a bit creaky. In fact, it’s probably on its last legs. The second problem with this paradigm is that it’s not new; it’s only a new version of other paradigms that have come and gone over the years. The late 1960s version, for example, was called the “One-Decision Stock Paradigm.” In this version, certain stocks had earnings that would grow forever, which meant their stock prices would go up forever. That, in turn, meant that investors would never have to sell the stocks. Thus, only one decision was necessary—to buy them.
That paradigm eventually collapsed when it turned out that some perpetual growth industries (like bowling) reached their saturation points far sooner than analysts expected; other perpetual
growth industries attracted competitors and price competition, thereby reducing profit margins (like calculators and CB radios); and economic recessions still surfaced from time to time, which had a tendency to affect all industries, turning growth stocks into normal, run-of-the-mill cyclical stocks. This way of thinking is new paradigm territory for 99.9 percent of investors and analysts. At first it may seem difficult and unusual, but if you have the courage to enter this new paradigm, you will find yourself in a fascinating new world where all sorts of new and exciting stock ideas will present themselves. You’ll also find that this new paradigm is sparsely populated, which at first may be uncomfortable. But eventually, seeing things that others do not see will eventually turn out to be the source of great excitement and satisfaction. You will understand things that others do not understand. At times, you’ll feel almost as if you can see the future, and
you will marvel at the inability of others to do the same.

Read More..

THE BULLS, THE BEARS, AND THE HORSES

The recent trend toward microanalyzing the stock market on a minute-by-minute basis has less to do with investing than it does with providing a “fix” for stock market addicts. In his classic book The Money Game, author George Goodman, writing under the name “Adam Smith,” says that most people are not in the stock market to make money; they are in it for the excitement. And if you were to catch a stockbroker in a moment of candor, you would probably discover that many have reached the same conclusion. A large part of the stock market’s explosive popularity in recent years is that the advent of financial television and the Internet has turned investing into a form of entertainment that provides a welcome diversion from the predictability of day-to-day life.
I completely understand this, of course, having spent 25 years of my life transfixed by the stock market. Watching the minute-by-minute analysis on financial television and having a real-time quote system on your desk is part of the appeal of the whole business. Nothing wrong with that, although this book is a way of pointing out that there is another way to approach the business of picking stocks, one that allows you the opportunity to get up from in front of your television set to get a glass of water and maybe even do a little gardening.
There are many people who will tell you that the stock market is actually just like horse racing, and if you stop to think about it, they may have a good point. As every horse bettor knows, there is nothing quite like the adrenaline rush one gets when your bet is down, the bell rings, the starting gate opens, and the track announcer says, “They’re off!”
This, of course, is precisely the feeling a day trader gets at ninethirty each morning when he or she is tuned in to CNBC. The only difference is that the chairman of Time Warner is not standing at the starting gate ringing the bell.
It is probably no accident that as the stock market has become increasingly popular and accessible to the masses over the past 15 years, the horse-racing industry has gone into a steady decline.
Financial magazines are multiplying like rabbits while the Daily
Racing Form has been sold and resold several times as its circulation
eroded year after year.
Let’s face it: Wall Street is beating the horse-racing business at its own game. While a horse race can provide periodic bursts of entertainment and excitement, each race lasts only a minute or two and is followed by a period of boredom and slowly building anticipation until the next race begins. On Wall Street you get nonstop action for 61⁄2 hours 5 days a week, and if you’re a real glutton for punishment, you can buy a sophisticated quotation system that allows you to sit around all night watching after-hours trading, and the opening of the Asian markets and the start of European trading in the predawn hours.
Wall Street never stops. How can horse racing compete with this? For one thing, they might try out the concept of horse brokers. In New York State there are Off Track Betting parlors scattered all over the place. What’s the difference between this and brokerage
firm branch offices? There are no horse brokers. The only thing these OTB parlors lack are salesmen with clients who can be badgered over the telephone to bet on the horses and generate some commission business. And why stop there? To support the sales force—excuse me, the horse brokers—OTB could even hire analysts to write research reports. If you are a “value” investor who concentrates on fundamentals, your horse broker could send you a report on the pedigree and training performances of a good-looking prospect in the seventh race at Belmont Park. Or if you are a “momentum” player who concentrates on technical analysis with a preference for following the “smart money,” you could get a frantic call from your horse broker doing his best James Cramer imitation moments before post time about some mysterious movement in the odds that could indicate somebody knows something.
“Who cares why the odds are going down?” he would scream into the telephone. “This is a momentum horse! Get your money down now, before it’s too late!” The similarities are endless. Was the jockey holding his horse the last time out so the trainer can turn him loose today and cash a big bet at large odds? Has that corporation been overstating its earnings to keep the stock price up so insiders can bail out at high prices? You want to take a shot at big money? Forget options—play the daily double—here are our top picks, for speculators, of course. What’s that? You’re wondering what to do with your pension funds? Why, that calls for a more conservative approach—how about allocating 5 percent of your account on the favorite, to show? One reason the stock market fascinates so many of us is that there are so many ways to approach it. This frantic moment-tomoment approach, in which the market is treated as though it were a racetrack or a casino, is certainly a valid way.

Read More..